|
|
|
|
WASTE PREVENTION FORUM ARCHIVE |
|
18 Aug 00 - pay-as-you-throw; shopper research; worms; job
** WASTE PREVENTION FORUM **
-- A project of the National Waste Prevention Coalition
--------
Forum archive: http://www.reuses.com/nwpcarchive
--------------------
The first two postings are in response to Bruce Nordman's 8/16/00 posting
about pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) garbage collection fee systems, in which
households are charged based on the amount of garbage they throw out, rather
than paying a flat fee.
--------------------
>From Brian Foran, California Integrated Waste Management Board, Sacramento,
CA:
I, like Bruce, am not aware of any solid evidence that PAYT refuse
collection fee systems achieve source reduction. On the surface, I also
agree with Bruce that the marginal cost of disposal is so small compared
with product purchase costs that few consumers will reduce their product
consumption in order to lower their garbage bill. However, I believe this
analysis overlooks the strength of symbolic measures and the ability of such
measures to change mindsets, which ultimately does lead to behavior change.
If nothing else, PAYT is a symbolic measure. Most consumers - no matter how
wealthy - will take note when their refuse collection bill increases, for
whatever reason. When consumers discover that the size of their refuse
collection bill correlates directly with the amount of garbage that they
throw away, a mental connection has been made that likely didn't exist
before. This, by itself, is worthwhile, even if the mental connection never
leads the consumer, for example, to use old T-shirts (ha!) for cleaning
instead of paper towels.
So many of the environmental problems in our society today are due to the
fact that the real cost of those problems are hidden from consumers. In a
traditional one-fee/one-can refuse collection system, there is no feedback
to the consumer that filling that garbage can to the brim results in any
more cost - financial or environmental - than putting the can out half-full.
A PAYT system at least provides feedback to the consumer that there is some
"punishment" for wasteful behavior and some "reward" for conserving
behavior. If more of our societal goods and services were based on a "pay
for what you use" system, I think that ultimately it would change consumers'
mindsets enough that source reduction behavior would result.
E-mail: bforan [A T] CIWMB [D O T] ca [D O T] gov
--------------------
>From Michelle Portman, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP), Boston, MA:
Tellus Institute (under contract to the Massachusetts DEP) attempted to
measure the amount of the source reduction and recycling resulting from
pay-as-you-throw in Massachusetts. This report, completed in December,
1999, found that the total amount of source reduction resulting from PAYT in
the 76 communities throughout the state that had adopted such a system was
43,130 tons in 1997; whereas, the resulting recycling amounted to 30,549
tons, making the total diversion attributed to PAYT programs 73,679 tons.
So, one can see that source reduction is a substantial amount of this total.
They also estimated, based on these figures, that if PAYT was adopted in all
351 communities throughout the state, 537,950 tons could have been
source-reduced statewide (out of a total of 918,970 tons that could have
been diverted as a result of PAYT programs). Not all of the source
reduction counted here is home yard waste!
Without getting into all the details found in the report, the parameters
used to estimate these quantities include: unit pricing charge, the type of
recycling available to the town (usually drop-off or curbside), and the
total municipal solid waste generated in each town. Some of these factors
were arrived at based on literature on PAYT impacts.
One can possibly take issue with some of the numbers, but this does give us
some idea of the potential contributions of PAYT programs.
E-mail: michelle [ D O T ] portman [ A T ] state [ D O T ] ma [ D O T ] us
--------------------
>From Ellen Harrison, Cornell University Waste Management Institute, Ithaca,
NY, responding to Susan Salterberg's 8/16/00 posting seeking information on
waste reduction campaigns:
You might be interested in a project we did several years ago on consumer
waste prevention education. We conducted a research project in which we
tracked shopper purchases before and after several different educational
interventions. The results showed no impact. To find out how to get a copy
of the final report on the project, or the summary, see our website at
www.cfe.cornell.edu/wmi Scroll down and click on "Educational Resources for
Solid Waste Management." Then scroll down and click on "Enviroshopping
Resources." The name of the project is, "Waste Reduction through Consumer
Education." We also have a couple of other items: A series of print, TV
and radio spots on waste prevention for consumers ("Nature Does It Right...
Why Can't We?") and a packet of ready-to-use Shop SMART materials (we used
Minnesota's Shop SMART - save money and reduce trash - concept/logo). Also
see the "Educational Resources for Solid Waste Management" section of the
website for info on how to get these.
E-mail: ezh1 [ A T ] cornell [ D O T ] edu
--------------------
Link to the website for the Vermillennium, the International Conference on
Vermiculture and Vermicomposting, which will be held Sept. 16-22, 2000, in
Kalamazoo, Michigan (forwarded by Marcia Rutan):
http://www.wormwoman.com/vermillennium.html
Note: This conference is hosted by Mary Appelhof, one of the leading
authorities on vermicomposting (also known as worm composting). Her website
is at: http://www.wormwoman.com
--------------------
Excerpt from a job announcement from the City of Everett, Massachusetts
(forwarded by Steve Long):
POSITION OPENING - RECYCLING COORDINATOR/GRANT MANAGER, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS
Job Description: Expand and maintain various recycling and source reduction
programs in the city of Everett (population 35,760). Track waste and
recycling tonnages. Help manage yard waste and white goods pick-up
contracts. Assist with City Hall recycling efforts. Promote buy-recycled
education in the city and within the municipal offices. Manage the
educational component of the city's recycling program and promote new
programs to boost recycling tonnages for paper and commingled products.
Coordinate the various grants, which the city applies for, and manage and
track performances of various programs. Oversee and expand the current
multi-family recycling program and the business-recycling program. Work
closely with the public works director and staff and a volunteer solid waste
committee. Plan and organize special events and boost the recycling rate of
the city.
Permanent full-time position, 35-hour work week. Salary Range: $25,500
plus (negotiable), plus benefits (no dental or vision). Position to be
filled as soon as possible.
Contact: David Ravanesi, director of public works, City Hall, Room 26,
Everett, MA, 02149. Phone: 617-394-2287.
--------------------
Reminder from Tom: I'll be out of the office August 21-24, so there will be
no Forum during that time.
- end -
|