NWPC HomeNWPC Archivebar
 

WASTE PREVENTION FORUM ARCHIVE

bullet   BACK TO ARCHIVE INDEX

  10 May 01 - college reuse; polystyrene; paperless billing; getting rid of lawns
        **  WASTE PREVENTION FORUM  **
-- A project of the National Waste Prevention Coalition
--------
Forum archive:  http://www.reuses.com/nwpcarchive

--------------------
From Jesse White, Resource Management Group, Tallevast, FL:

We're working with the University of South Florida and the Recycling Task
Force of Hillsborough County, FL, to develop an electronic exchange for
students to buy, sell or trade their stuff instead of disposing of reusable
materials.  We've just completed a Beta version of the web site. I'd like to
invite members of the Waste Prevention Forum to visit the site, and send us
your comments so we can make it as effective as possible.  The website is
called DormOutfitter and the address is:  http://www.dormoutfitter.com/   

The start-up funding for the project comes from the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection.

E-mail: jwhite [ A T ] recyclesmart [ D O T ] com

-------------------
From Nicole Schellenberg Stewart, Washington County Public Health &
Environment, Stillwater, MN:

Washington County has implemented a waste reduction program in its offices,
and I have received some interesting feedback from our Parks Department
regarding the Styrofoam cups they use in their concession stand.  I am
working with them on alternatives. 

Below is the e-mail I received from our Parks Department, who had received
information from their supply rep.  Has anyone heard this "argument" in
favor of polystyrene?  I would rather encourage other alternatives such as
biodegradable products.  If anyone has any information on alternatives, that
would be very helpful.  

From our Parks Department:
"....I heard back from our cup rep and he had some interesting comments.
His feeling is that Styrofoam cups are the cheapest and most environmentally
safe cups to use.  To biodegrade, paper or biodegradable cups need oxygen,
sunlight and moisture and they don't get that in a landfill.  If they are
burned, Styrofoam burns cleaner (if it is black and smoky, it is not burning
hot enough, but the chemicals released are less than paper or plastic).  He
also said it takes 16 times more energy to produce paper or plastic than
Styrofoam.  He is checking to see if the Styrofoam cup manufacturer (Dart)
still runs a recycling program for their cups.  Also, he was going to send
some info over on how Styrofoam compares to plastic and paper in regards to
cost to produce, cost to use and cost to dispose/recycle.  His feeling is
that we need to educate the public on why Styrofoam is a good choice."

Any information people can provide would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you.

E-mail:  nicole [DOT] stewart [AT] co [DOT] washington [DOT] mn [DOT] us

--------------------
The next two postings are in response to the 5/4/01 posting describing a
magazine ad for AT&T's new "paperless billing" service, which points out
that this online billing service "saves time, checks, and the occasional
deciduous tree."

--------------------
From Blair Pollock, Chapel Hill Solid Waste Management Department, Chapel
Hill, NC: 

Wouldn't it be more likely to save a pine tree?

E-mail:  bpollock [AT] co [DOT] orange [DOT] nc [DOT] us

-------------------
From Marcia Rutan, Snohomish County Solid Waste Management Division,
Everett, WA:

Below is a testimonial for paperless bills and payments from a colleague
here at Snohomish County:

Marcia - In the past two weeks, I've gone to paperless bills for our Texaco,
Chevron, Verizon, and two Puget Sound Energy accounts - that's five fewer
paper bills each month.  I've done online banking for about two years, but
now we get electronic statements and pay with a click of the mouse.  I love
it!!!!!  I can't wait for more companies to send electronic statements.  If
anyone is ever looking for a real person to give testimony about the ease of
online banking and electronic statements, you can refer them to me.   - Suzi
Wong Swint

Marcia's e-mail:  marcia [ DOT ] rutan [ AT ] co [ DOT ] snohomish [ DOT ] wa [ DOT ] us 

-------------------
Excerpted from a 5/5/01 article by Timothy Egan on the front page of the New
York Times:

ANTI-LAWN MOVEMENT PICKS UP STEAM
Prompted by water restrictions and fed up with the demands of keeping a
rectangle in crew-cut, perpetual green, some homeowners around the country
are giving up on the traditional lawn.

Though landscape architects have sneered at lawns for years, and many people
in arid areas long ago threw in the sprinkler, the movement is clearly
taking on momentum - no easy feat in a country that still has enough
domestic sod to cover the state of Pennsylvania.

Many cities and towns are now encouraging people to lose the Kentucky
bluegrass, offering cash rebates to people who replace their lawns with rock
gardens, perennial beds, a tangle of ivy, cactuses or other kinds of less
water-gluttonous plantings. Researchers at the National Gardening
Association, a nonprofit group, say as much as 10 percent of all yards may
be dominated by something other than grass.

People are returning long-banished native plants to their yards - not only
cactuses and yuccas in the arid West, but also buffalo grass on the high
plains and live oak and buttonwood in Florida, where a drought is in its
fourth year. In Atlanta, where home lawn demands have drained water
resources in a city struggling with drought, more than 900 people in the
last few years have ripped up their lawns and replaced them with backyard
wildlife patches certified by the National Wildlife Federation. And in
Sharon, Mass., a city of 17,000 that is dependent on water from six wells
for its dwindling water supply, officials are trying to encourage people to
reduce their dependence on turf.

In the garden-crazed city of Seattle, a drought may force water restrictions
this summer.  Seattle Tilth, an organic gardening society, offers a class on
how to rip up the yard. Former green-grass enthusiasts gather like addicts
in a 12-step program to share advice on how to be lawn-free.

American lawn lineage goes back to England, where the wet climate and
temperate weather are ideal for growing grasses. In the United States, home
lawn obsession has generally been traced to envy over the carpets of green
laid in parks and planned communities designed by Frederick Law Olmsted, the
premier American landscape architect of the 19th century.

But much of the turf grass grown in the United States is not native, and
requires a lot of water, chemical herbicide and fertilizer to keep up its
appearance. The average lawn will use up to 10,000 gallons of water over a
summer, according to city water departments. And the National Wildlife
Federation says the average suburban lawn takes in 10 times the pesticides
as an acre of farmland.

Companies dedicated to growing, fertilizing and mowing grass are not taking
this nascent antilawn movement lying down. "The lawn is starting to get a
bad rap," said Kerry Bierman, a spokesman for Scotts Company, the world's
largest seller of lawn and garden products. "But I don't think you have to
apologize for a good-looking yard. The lawn is a friend." Grass takes heat
out of cities, releases oxygen, and provides a holding buffer for water that
otherwise might run into sewers, Mr. Bierman said. "It may be a feel-good
thing to get rid of your lawn, but it doesn't always save water," he said.

Mr. Bierman could be in for a prolonged battle. High-end gardening magazines
have been running detailed features on how to grow an environmentally
correct patch of the original American prairie, or return moss to a shaded
area. Moss and prairie grass, of course, have long been the nemesis of the
perfect lawn movement.

Many cities, reluctant to build new irrigation systems or mine deep aquifers
for new water, are simply trying to get people to change their gardening
aesthetics. In Glendale, Ariz., for example, homeowners can receive a $100
rebate for converting 50 percent or more of their grass to lower-water-use
shrubs or plants. In Southern California, where the lawn has been under
assault for some time, the Metropolitan Water District, which serves 17
million households and uses up to half its water on home irrigation, is
studying similar cash-for-grass programs.

In Denver, the term "xeriscape" was coined to promote a seven-step program
to get people to use plants that conserve water. The word, based on the
Greek word for "dry," has now been evoked in numerous ordinances around the
country. City officials say about 25 percent of all homeowners served by the
Denver water department have converted some or all of their lawns into yards
more adaptive to the arid, high-elevation climate near the Rocky Mountain
Front Range.

Federal officials are looking to see how much water can be saved by
replacing grass with other species. Preliminary results, from Las Vegas,
showed that a city could save 40 percent of its water by taking the new
landscaping approach.

In some communities, the desire to save water runs into strict covenants
that require homeowners to keep green, perfectly mowed grass of a certain
species. Sara Romeo, a state legislator from Tampa, lives in a private
community in a part of Florida that is under tight water restrictions,
making it impossible to water her lawn more than one day a week. But Ms.
Romeo has been cited by the homeowners association for not keeping her grass
- the water-consuming St. Augustine species - in the green. As a result, she
has introduced a bill in the Florida Legislature - which is given a good
chance of passing - to allow people in deed-restricted communities to grow
something other than St. Augustine grass. "It's crazy," Ms. Romeo said. "We
live in a state with a terrible drought, and half the water is going to
landscaping."

Others share her frustration. "We created the lawn industrial complex,
giving half our drinking water over to keeping the grass green at all
times," said Jim Knopf, a Colorado landscape designer and author of two
books on new-style yards. "But a lot of people are now looking for
alternatives, and once you convince them they can have something that looks
good, doesn't cost as much and requires less work, they will abandon the
old-style lawn."
				- end -


  The Waste Prevention Forum archive is hosted by Reuses.com.