NWPC HomeNWPC Archivebar
 

WASTE PREVENTION FORUM ARCHIVE

bullet   BACK TO ARCHIVE INDEX

  05 Jun 02 - mercury; toxics; grocery bags; green advice; school cafeterias
         **  WASTE PREVENTION FORUM  **
-- A project of the National Waste Prevention Coalition
--------
Forum archive:  http://www.reuses.com/nwpcarchive

--------------------
Link to the text of Connecticut's new law restricting the sale and use of
various products containing mercury, from the state of Connecticut website: 

http://www.cga.state.ct.us/2002/act/Pa/2002PA-00090-R00HB-05539-PA.htm
This law was signed on June 3 by Connecticut Governor John Rowland, and
takes effect July 1, 2002.  According to a 6/4/02 Associated Press article,
the bill "phases out products with high mercury levels and bans sales of
mercury thermometers without a doctor's prescription and novelty items that
contain mercury, such as sneakers that light up." 

-------------------
Link to a copy of a full-page ad that ran in the 6/5/02 New York Times, from
the Center for Children's Health and the Environment (CCHE), warning that
toxic chemicals in the environment can cause learning disabilities: 

http://www.childenvironment.org   Scroll down, and click on the ad to
enlarge it.  CCHE is an academic research and policy center, established in
1998 within the Department of Community and Preventive Medicine of the Mount
Sinai School of Medicine.  CCHE's mission is to promote the health of
children by conducting environmental health and policy research. 

-------------------
From Theresa Travison, Baltimore, MD:

I'm interested in starting a neighborhood campaign to have a local grocery
store charge a nominal fee for bags.  (I'm not associated with any
organization or agency.)  I have heard customers say that this would help
them remember to bring back old grocery bags to the store, to reuse them.  I
have heard of stores in Europe that charge for bags.  Does anyone know of
any stores that charge for bags in the U.S.?  Has anyone campaigned for this
before?  Where can I get facts about grocery store waste in general, and
information about bag production in particular?  Thanks in advance for your
help.

E-mail:  tdncng (AT) yahoo (DOT) com

--------------------
Link to an environmental advice column by Umbra Fisk, in the 6/4/02 Grist
Magazine: 

http://www.gristmagazine.com/ask/ask060402.asp   This column includes her
answer to the question:  At the grocery store, which is better - paper or
plastic bags?  She also makes the point that, "Recycling and trash reduction
are lulling us into a haze of soporific self-satisfaction."

--------------------
The next two items are in response to the 6/3/02 posting seeking information
on school cafeteria packaging alternatives and reduction.

---------------------
From Marcia Rutan, Snohomish County Solid Waste Management Division,
Everett, WA:

One aspect of school lunchroom packaging that I've been examining is
individual milk containers, particularly in elementary schools. Following
discussions with representatives from TetraPak (gabletop milk "boxes") and
DuPont (milk pouches), and implementing a milk pouch pilot with Edmonds
School District (22,000 students), I'm polishing a report that I originally
prepared for a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sustainability class.
This report briefly examines and compares milk box recycling and composting
(which has promising diversion possibilities, when combined with food
waste), and milk pouches, which are a significant waste prevention measure
(reducing lunchroom waste up to 70 percent and the overall school waste
stream 10 to 30 percent, plus a reduction in resources used at the front
end). I'd be happy to send this report by attachment to anyone who sends me
an e-mail.
 
E-mail:  marcia ( DOT ) rutan ( AT ) co ( DOT ) snohomish ( DOT ) wa ( DOT ) us 

--------------------
From Sharon Aller, King County Solid Waste Division, Seattle, WA:

It would be interesting to see an article on how school lunches are
different from when we were kids.  This is what I know:  All meat is cooked
off-site and not by districts.  Too much liability for contamination.  So
that would be packaged, already cooked and brought in.  Many schools have
"pick and choose"; you pick your food ala carte, so there's packaging logic
there.  Lots of districts contract with restaurants and a different vendor
brings the food in each day.  You have McDonald's day, you have Domino's
Pizza day, etc.  More packaged food.  Then there are the controversial
vending machines.

New schools no longer have kitchens - too expensive to build and maintain
individual kitchens - so all food is prepared at a central off-site location
and trucked in.  More packaging.  And no dishwashing facilities.  I lived in
a large school district once that didn't have any school lunch program at
all.  No packaging there, but everyone brought their packaged lunch.  

I really don't care how they do it as long as the kids get fed.  The
national school lunch program in the U.S. is responsible for feeding more
children breakfast and lunch than any of us can imagine, and for many kids
those are the only meals they get each day. 

E-mail:  sharon ( D O T ) aller ( A T ) metrokc ( D O T ) gov
						- end -


  The Waste Prevention Forum archive is hosted by Reuses.com.