NWPC HomeNWPC Archivebar
 

WASTE PREVENTION FORUM ARCHIVE

bullet   BACK TO ARCHIVE INDEX

  04 Oct 02 - disposables; hospitals; Buy Nothing Day; Netflix; NWPC project
         **  WASTE PREVENTION FORUM  **
-- A project of the National Waste Prevention Coalition
--------
Forum archive:  http://www.reuses.com/nwpcarchive

--------------------
From the drugstore.com website:

NEW DISPOSABLE KITCHEN PRODUCT
Saran Disposable Cutting Sheets, made by S.C. Johnson & Son, are plastic
sheets that you put on top of a cutting board.  They are described as "the
convenient way to contain the germy mess left behind when cutting chicken,
meat, fish, vegetables and much more.  Now, when cutting or preparing food,
simply lay down a new Saran Disposable Cutting Sheet.  When you are done,
just throw away the sheet with the germy mess!"  A package of 20 of these
sheets costs $3.99 on the drugstore.com website.  A full description of the
product is at:
http://www.drugstore.com/qxp77085_333181_SESpider/Saran/Disposable_Cutting_Sheets.htm
   

Note:  This product is now also being advertised on television, and is
currently available in stores, in at least some parts of the country.

--------------------
Link to an online guide for hospitals, "Waste Reduction Guide: Cutting Costs
& Minimizing Waste From Your Facility," published by Hospitals for a Healthy
Environment:

http://www.h2e-online.org/tools/guide.htm

--------------------
Link to information on the 2002 Buy Nothing Day, from the website of
Adbusters, a non-profit advocacy organization based in Vancouver, BC:

http://www.adbusters.org/campaigns/bnd  This year Buy Nothing Day will be
held Friday, Nov. 29 in the U.S. and Canada.  It will be held Saturday, Nov.
30 in Europe, and will also be held in other countries as well, on one of
those dates.  Information on Buy Nothing Day in the United Kingdom is at:
http://www.buynothingday.co.uk

--------------------
Excerpted from a business column by Peter Wayner in the 9/23/02 New York
Times, following up on a  7/31/02 Forum posting about Netflix:

Netflix is a national company that rents DVDs of movies through a membership
program, sending the discs to customers through the U.S. mail.  Netflix uses
minimal packaging (just a simple paper envelope) that is reused to send the
disc back.

The New York Times column notes that Netflix has been very successful - The
company mails about 190,000 discs each day to its 670,000 subscribers.

--------------------
From Tom Watson, King County Solid Waste Division, Seattle, WA, and the
National Waste Prevention Coalition:

We have received more responses regarding the proposals for a new National
Waste Prevention Coalition (NWPC) project, so we are running excerpts from
those responses below.  Thanks again to everyone who has responded.  If you
have comments on people's responses to the proposals, or additional comments
on the proposals themselves, please e-mail those to me by Oct. 11.

Once again, the preliminary project ideas are:  Junk Phone Book Reduction;
Waste Prevention SWAT Team;  Double-Sided Printing Breakthrough Project;
War on Obsolescence.  For brief descriptions of these proposals, see the
9/26/02 posting (click on the link to the archive at the top of this
message).

For those Forum readers who are not really interested in the new NWPC
project, don't worry - We certainly won't be doing all the work on the new
NWPC project on this Forum.  But, people's responses about the project have
covered a lot of pertinent waste prevention issues, so we thought people
would be interested in the responses.  Thanks!

E-mail:  tom ( DOT ) watson ( AT ) metrokc ( DOT ) gov

-------------------
From Carl Hursh, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, waste
reduction and recycling program, Harrisburg, PA:

I would like to join the list of folks who recognize the opportunity to make
an impact by focusing on unwanted telephone directories.  In Pennsylvania we
can be served by two phone companies, one for local and one for long
distance service.  We now (again) have the ability to be served by one
company for both services.  I find this having the opposite effect of a
service monopoly:  companies must vie for customers by offering the most
competitive prices.  If you choose to have two different service providers,
you invite two telephone directories to your door.  Compounding this problem
is that another company offering service in my county that I do not
subscribe to must feel that I need its directory as well.  So that makes
three directories for me.  Add the "Yellow Book" and you can see why I have
a five-foot stack of directories in my vestibule, arranged by size, company
and date, on which I throw my car keys when I get home.  I will soon need to
participate in my county's phone book collection drive as it becomes more
difficult to grope for the keys in the dark.
 
We have had positive discussions over the years with telephone book
publishers (YPPA - the Yellow Pages Publishers Association, now known as the
Yellow Pages Integrated Media Association) to encourage the use of
recycled-content paper, to render their products more recyclable by using
water-soluble glues and by being more careful about telephone book cover
adornments, and to assist with implementing and operating telephone book
collection programs.  I believe we could reestablish a dialogue with the
industry to develop alternatives to the annual delivery of unwanted
telephone books.  An example of an alternative is the "Superpages" CD-ROM
offered by one of the companies serving Pennsylvania.  Another could be a
notice with your telephone bill where you could select between receiving a
telephone book or a CD-ROM, or neither, along with a link to a web site
containing a directory reflecting real-time listing updates.
 
I believe the best opportunities for waste reduction education exist when
the topic hits home.  When people can actually connect to the problem, they
begin to understand and recognize other examples where they can have an
impact.  Unwanted telephone directories is such an issue. 

E-mail:  chursh ( AT ) state ( DOT ) pa ( DOT ) us

-------------------
From Wayne Gash, Washington State University (WSU), Material Resource
Services, Pullman, WA:

My two cents, for what it's worth:  Before we started recycling at WSU,
nearly 15 years ago now, we had a very innovative surplus property program
that reused items generated on campus, and I also went out and "screened"
and brought in state and federal used property for "reutilization" on
campus.  The program was not funded.  We generated enough revenue to operate
and gave money back to the departments every year.  Our entire recycling
program operated for years with reutilized trucks and forklifts and apple
barrels, and on and on.  So, my roots are really in waste reduction rather
than recycling.  Also, as an auctioneer, I know that you can sell virtually
anything for reuse as something, you just have to put the idea in someone's
head.  My motto; "J-U-N-K is a four-letter word."
 
Of the four proposed projects, I would rate the War on Obsolescence the
highest priority.  It ties in very closely with product stewardship, which
has to happen.  It's just a matter of time.  

My take on the junk phone books:  You can't stop them, but can you get them
to take them back? 

On double-sided printing:  It's force of habit, which is strong.  There is
no logical reason not to double-side.  Just pick up any book, magazine or
newspaper.

E-mail:  wcgash [A T] wsu [D O T] edu

-------------------
From Katie Jensen, Austin Energy Green Building Program, Austin, TX: 

Here is another suggestion for an NWPC project:  

Writing Utensil Waste Reduction - Disposable pens and other writing utensils
are a waste that can easily, with some thought and effort, be greatly
reduced.  There are many angles that this project may take:  1) Focusing on
soy- and vegetable-based inks;  2) Recycled-content and recyclable pen
bodies;  3) Working with employers or employees (depending on which angle
the group thinks is most appropriate) to encourage the purchase of pen
bodies, requiring the purchase (thus the disposal) of only the refill as
needed.  Obviously, all three of these ideas could work together, though it
seems the third option would reduce the most site-generated waste and the
first and second options would reduce a large quantity of chemical waste.
 
E-mail:  katie [ DOT ] jensen [ AT ] austinenergy [ DOT ] com 

--------------------
From Jim Hill, California Department of Conservation, Sacramento, CA:

Regarding new programs for the NWPC: How about a Best Practices
clearinghouse? Something along the lines of what the Clean Washington Center
did with recycling technologies a few years ago. NWPC could collect model
program information for targeted groups, such as businesses, local
government, state agencies, general public. The database could be in a
standard format, including contact information, barriers, cost assessments,
strategy, etc. Case in point: In California state government, we have waste
reduction mandates, yet we lurch along slowly because of limited staff,
dissimilar agency objectives, inertia, etc. A "how-to" manual with real case
studies could help. I realize the NWPC web site has many useful links - but
I think a more standardized, in-depth Best Practices database would be
helpful.

E-mail:  jhill (AT) consrv (DOT) ca (DOT) gov 

-------------------
From Tom Watson:

I'll be out of the office next Wednesday through Friday, Oct. 9-11, so there
will be no Forum during that time.  Thanks!
							- end -


  The Waste Prevention Forum archive is hosted by Reuses.com.