NWPC HomeNWPC Archivebar
 

WASTE PREVENTION FORUM ARCHIVE

bullet   BACK TO ARCHIVE INDEX

  03 Oct 03 - diapers; labels; batteries; videos; grant awards; cars; dumping
           **  WASTE PREVENTION FORUM  **
-- A project of the National Waste Prevention Coalition
--------
Forum archive:  http://www.reuses.com/nwpcarchive  

---------------------
From Angelique Mullen, Bay Area Cloth Advocates, San Francisco, CA:

I was just wondering if anyone knows where to find accurate waste
statistics.  Specifically, I am looking for stats on how many disposable
diapers are thrown away every year in the U.S. Many of the sources I read
say 18 billion, but that is from the late eighties, so I am sure it must be
more by now.  Thanks very much.
 
E-mail:  terang [AT] sbcglobal [DOT] net

---------------------
The next three messages are in response to the 9/29/03 posting from Lisa
Friend asking if anyone knows of a good source for "we are reusing this
envelope" labels.

--------------------
From Jeffrey Smedberg, County of Santa Cruz Public Works Department,
recycling programs, Santa Cruz, CA:

For many years I have used labels sold by Friends of the Earth to easily
reuse envelopes.  They are still offered on the Friends of the Earth website
at:  http://www.foe.org/mail/merch.html

E-mail:  dpw179 [AT] co [DOT] santa-cruz [DOT] ca [DOT] us

---------------------
From Susan Ziolko, Clackamas County Community Environmental Services, waste
reduction program, Clackamas OR:

We have had rubber stamps made to use - especially on large envelopes and
boxes that are being reused. They say: "Pardon My Looks, I'm Reused!"  This
saves the labels and can work on many items.

E-mail:  susanz [AT] co [DOT] clackamas [DOT] or [DOT] us

---------------------
From Michelle Portman, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection,
Bureau of Resource Protection, Boston, MA:

I just use plain labels about 1.5 x 1.5 inches for reusing envelopes -
especially those that come pre-addressed from banks, non-profits soliciting
donations, credit card companies, etc.   It seems like printing special
"reuse" labels is redundant and obviates part of the source reduction
aspect.    

E-mail:  Michelle [ DOT ] Portman [ AT ] state [ DOT ] ma [ DOT ] us

---------------------
From Sondra Flite, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP),
Trenton, NJ, responding to the 9/29/03 posting saying that one concern for a
corporation using the Rechargeable Battery Recycling Corporation (RBRC)
program is that batteries must be managed under the Universal Waste rules at
the generator site:

Technically, citizens' personal waste is exempt from being universal waste.
It's household hazardous waste.  But since you can't tell whether businesses
are putting their phones and batteries in the collection, you may as well
categorize the whole collection as Universal Waste. 

The Universal Waste program is very friendly to collectors, so stores
collecting batteries, such as Best Buy, can easily comply, either within the
RBRC program or not. Best Buy becomes a Universal Waste Handler. A
small-quantity handler has almost no requirements.  A large-quantity handler
in New Jersey has to tell DEP that they exist, keep records on what they
collect, label the material, keep it for no more than a year, and report
once a year. They don't need permits, and they don't pay fees.  RBRC is also
a handler, and needs to do the same, and make sure the materials go to a
recycler. A piece of cake for any large corporation. 

E-mail:  Sondra [DOT] Flite [AT] dep [DOT] state [DOT] nj [DOT] us

---------------------
From Susan Ziolko, Clackamas County Community Environmental Services, waste
reduction program, Clackamas OR, in response to the 9/29/03 posting seeking
a video that promotes office waste prevention:

The Oregon State University (OSU) Extension Master Recycler Program, with a
grant from the Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality (DEQ), produced three
waste prevention videos several years ago. One focuses specifically on
offices ("Better Than Recycling: Waste Prevention in the Office"), one on
manufacturing ("Better than Recycling: Waste Prevention in Manufacturing and
Distribution"), and the third is more general ("Why Should I Bother: Waste
Prevention in the Workplace"). They range from 13 to 16 minutes long. Info
in the videos overlap each other, as they weren't all intended to be shown
to the same audience. They were produced by Oregon State University and can
be purchased from them. E-mail: Puborders (AT) orst (DOT) edu   If you are in Oregon,
they can be borrowed from your local DEQ solid waste & recycling office, as
well as from many local government solid waste & recycling offices.

E-mail:  susanz [ AT ] co [ DOT ] clackamas [ DOT ] or [ DOT ] us

Note:  These videos can be viewed on the OSU Extension website at:
http://extension.oregonstate.edu/videos/index.php?PHPSESSID=eabb69d4456fa9e2c248161dddad5d09
   Click on the drop-down box under "Business Management"
and select the video title.  (This link forwarded by Kyle Pogue.)

---------------------
Excerpted from a message from Sarah Weimer, California Integrated Waste
Management Board, Sacramento, CA:

ANNOUNCEMENT OF CALIFORNIA REUSE ASSISTANCE GRANT AWARDS
The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) is awarding the
following seven applicants with Reuse Assistance Grants from Fiscal Year
2003/2004 funds. The grant recipients, amount awarded, and project
descriptions are as follows:

City of Arcata - $19,225
The City will partner with the Arcata Endeavor, a local nonprofit agency
that operates the Multiple Assistance Center for homeless families and
individuals in Arcata.  The Endeavor will recruit and hire a reuse project
coordinator and a Driver-Distribution Manager who will be responsible for
working with local grocers, restaurants, and caterers to reclaim edible food
and distribute it to hungry people, either in the form of free meals served
at the site or food boxes distributed to needy families.  The project will
be extended to include donations of clothing and household items.  It will
significantly decrease the amount of food that is wasted and increase the
ability of the Endeavor to provide meals and commodities to homeless and
indigent families in a cost effective and organized manner.

City of Lakewood - $43,615
This project will divert the city's Bulky Item Collection donations to reuse
facilities; this will cover many elements of reuse, including construction
and demolition debris, electronics, and household bulky items.  The project
will focus mainly on the residential sector.  The City will also work with
the local hauler to divert as many of the collected items as possible to
local charitable organizations that have need for those items.  It is
estimated that this program will divert 67.5 tons on average per month for
reuse purposes.

Kern County - $8,382
Grant funds will kick off an electronics reuse program for commercial
businesses and residents in Kern County.  Businesses and residents will
participate by donating dated electronics to the local, nonprofit thrift
store network, including Goodwill and the Salvation Army.  Collected
electronic waste will be transported to and processed by the Bakersfield
Association of Retarded Citizens (BARC).   Material that is in good working
order, refurbishable, or marketable will be managed by BARC technical staff
and will eventually be sold or donated through the thrift store network.
Unmarketable material will be demanufactured by BARC staff, with component
parts used for the refurbishing program, or will be responsibly recycled.

Marin County - $37,728
This project will involve the creation, promotion, and maintenance of a
local web-based materials exchange program, MarinMax, which will divert a
significant amount of reusable material from disposal.  MarinMax will focus
on connecting those with surplus building materials, electronics, and other
durable goods with those who can utilize these materials.  MarinMax will be
hosted on Marin County's Hazardous and Solid Waste Regional Agency web site,
Marinrecycles.org.  Additionally, Marin County Public Works staff will
conduct a sizable community outreach program to solicit listings from
building associations, nonprofits, schools, and businesses.

Nevada County - $45,021 (partially funded from FY 2002/2003 funds) 
Grant funds will be used to include the design, planning, construction, and
promotion of a building materials reuse facility.  There is currently no
reuse opportunity available for these materials in the County.  

Santa Cruz County - $46,328
This project will assist with the refurbishment and distribution of
discarded computer equipment, and upgrade the existing ProMAX materials
reuse network using the CIWMB-funded NapaMAX web site as a template.  A
vocational training program providing computer technician certification will
be established for inmates of the County's minimum-security detention
facility, who will, in the course of their study, refurbish equipment that
can be redistributed to low-income individuals, charitable organizations,
and educational institutions.  The County has identified an ample supply of
working reusable computers destined for disposal, and a huge market that can
use the refurbished computers.  Sourcing and distribution of used computer
equipment will be aided by an upgrade of the regional materials exchange
program, ProMAX.

Ventura County - $49,700
Grant funds will be used to support the struggling Habitat for Humanity
ReStore, Ventura County's only reuse option for construction and demolition
discards.  The majority of the funds will be used to pay two California
Conservation Corps members to collect donations of reusable building
materials from homes and construction sites for two years.  This is key to
the project's success, as no pick-up service is currently available.  The
remaining funds will be used for on-screen ads in two theatres, Spanish
language radio ads, and quarterly, targeted bulk-mailings.  These efforts
are intended to generate high-quality donations, increase awareness of the
ReStore and its tax donation benefits, and expand the ReStore's customer
base in the English and Spanish speaking communities of the County.

In addition to the Reuse Assistance Grants, the California Integrated Waste
Management Board has an ever-growing list of reuse resources, which are
available on the Board's Reuse web site at: http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/reuse/.

E-mail: sweimer ( A T ) ciwmb ( D O T ) ca ( D O T ) gov 

---------------------
From Ed Minas, Kirkland, WA:  

I am interested in exploring what a car-free community might be like and
would like to find like-minded people who would like to start a discussion
group.  Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions as to how I might connect
with folks who would like to explore the idea?  Thanks in advance. 

E-mail:  shelties [A T] bainbridge [D O T] net  

---------------------
Excerpted from a message from Jamie Cahillane, Center for Ecological
Technology, Pittsfield, MA:

An "Idle-free campaign" has started in my hometown of Lenox, Massachusetts.
A group of local residents is trying to get people, trucking companies and
visitors to shut off their vehicles if they will be sitting for more than 10
seconds.  A little-known Massachusetts state law already exists that limits
engine idling to no more than five minutes, and this campaign would like to
build on that.  For more information on this campaign, contact me at
jamiec (A T) cetonline (D O T) org or Richard Gregg at rhgregg ( A T ) aol ( D O T ) com

---------------------
Excerpted from a 9/30/03 article by Nancy Kinsey Needham in the Los Angeles
Times (forwarded by Gary Liss):

OVERNIGHT DONATIONS LESS THAN CHARITABLE
Charities call them "midnight donors." They're the people who dump their
worn couch, out-of-date computer or 15-year-old refrigerator outside thrift
stores - acts that cost charities thousands of dollars. 

"We spend about $5,000 a month in Ventura County on trash-disposal fees for
items dumped outside our facilities at night," said John Benedetti of the
Salvation Army. Goodwill pays $7,000 to $10,000 a month for abandoned items
to be carted away from its 10 stores in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties.
In each case, the money spent might have gone to feeding or clothing the
poor, or training a worker for a new job.

Throughout Southern California, Goodwill paid $475,000 in 2002 to haul away
unwanted donations, said Kim Ferraro, vice president of development and
community relations. That figure does not include the cost of warehousing
items such as used computer monitors that cannot be easily disposed of
because of their toxic parts, Ferraro said.

Kathy Leahy, chief executive of Goodwill Industries of Ventura and Santa
Barbara counties, agreed. "Middle-of-the-night donors are a huge concern and
expense for us." In addition to its trash bill, the organization pays a
full-time crew to go to each facility twice a day and clean up unwanted
donations, she said. Plus, an operative works throughout the night to
discourage midnight donors. Still, daybreak brings stacks of toxic waste,
tires, broken appliances and other discards piled outside their doors. If
anything of value is left, there are those who also come at night and take
it, Leahy said.

"People could be cited - if we caught them," said Eric Nishimoto, spokesman
for the Ventura County Sheriff's Department. But, as far as Nishimoto can
tell, there have been no arrests in connection with illegal dumping at
thrift stores in Ventura County in 2002 or so far in 2003. Deputy District
Attorney Derek Malan said his office has yet to see a case involving someone
illegally dumping outside a thrift store, but there would be consequences if
someone were caught in the act. Dumping on public or private property can
result in up to six months in jail and a fine of $500 to $4,000, Malan said.
The fine can be doubled if tires are dumped.

People need to use common sense when deciding what to do with an item,
thrift store managers say. "I think people honestly mean well and don't
realize how much it costs us to pay to take away a couch or a file cabinet,"
said Joy Hagestad, volunteer manager of Senior Concerns Bargain Boutique in
Thousand Oaks.  Goodwill's Leahy said: "Somehow they think we don't have to
pay for dumping, but we pay by the pound. People need to think - If it's
trash to them, if it's not something they would buy in a retail store, we
can't use it."
						- end -


  The Waste Prevention Forum archive is hosted by Reuses.com.