NWPC HomeNWPC Archivebar
 

WASTE PREVENTION FORUM ARCHIVE

bullet   BACK TO ARCHIVE INDEX

  13 Feb 04 - convenience; chopsticks; lids; repair; prize; design
           **  WASTE PREVENTION FORUM  **
-- A project of the National Waste Prevention Coalition
--------
Forum archive:  http://www.reuses.com/nwpcarchive  

---------------------
Excerpted from 2/5/04 and 2/6/04 reports by consumer reporter Liz Crenshaw
on WRC-TV (NBC4), Washington, DC (from transcripts on the station's
website):

THE COST OF CONVENIENCE
Vicky Weiland, a teacher of Family and Consumer Sciences (what used to be
called "Home Ec") at Robert Frost Middle School in Potomac, Maryland, has
calculated the annual costs of a number of disposable and convenience
products, compared with their more traditional counterparts.  Here's what
she found out:

Over one year:
- Pre-packaged lunches for children, $299.  Buying items separately and
making at home, $180.  (For 100 school lunches.)
- Tuna lunch-to-go kits, $99.  Homemade tuna lunches, $49
- Furniture polish wipes, $43.  Canned furniture polish, $25.
- Car cleaning wipes, $14.  Spray bottle of car cleaner plus paper towels,
$9.
- Windex wipes, $42.  Spray Windex and towels, $14.
- Dish wipes, $73.  Dish washing liquid and sponge, $60.
- Disposable cutting sheets, $20.  A cutting board, $8.
- Clorox Ready-Mop system, $49.  Sponge mop and cleaner, $30.

----------------------
From Renee Kimball, Enuf! (an "enviro-boogie" band), Portland, OR:

CALLING ALL CHOPSTICKS, AND A CHALLENGE
First I would like to thank all those who continue to send me the AOL tins
and jewel cases for our CDs - your kindness is appreciated!

We also have an ongoing need for chopsticks - we use them as "drumsticks"
for the Wastrument(TM) Workshops and we have a lot of them coming up.  Any
arrivals would be most welcome.

As an incentive to promote an event in September, Enuf! is challenging all
you creative types to come up with a good REUSE idea for lids of plastic
tubs.  We're hoping to get an idea we can teach to others, so simple and
resource-efficient is grand!

The main purpose of this is to draw attention to keeping them out of the
recycling stream, as they don't bail well and become deadly flying missiles
when projected from beneath a truck tire in a storage yard.  It's also an
effort to find some way of reusing this non-recyclable item.

To sweeten the effort - we're offering $100 to the winning idea.

E-mail:  Renee (A T) EnufWaste (D O T) com
Mailing address:  Renee Kimball, 2224 SE Umatilla St., Portland, OR, 97202
Phone:  503-238-6973

----------------------
Excerpted from a 1/13/04 article by Billy Cox in Florida Today:

ELECTRONICS REPAIR HARDER TO FIND
Independent electronic service technicians have been bailing out in droves
for at least a decade, according to a survey conducted last year by the
Professional Service Association (PSA), an industry trade organization. The
PSA reported that more than 20,000 repair shops listed in the Yellow Pages
nationwide in 1992 had dropped to below 9,000 in 2002. And with schools
cutting back on electronics-repair courses, the free-fall has yet to hit
bottom.

----------------------
From a 2/10/04 item on the Ethical Performance listserv:

Alcan, an aluminum company based in Montreal, has created an annual prize of
$1 million (U.S. funds) to recognize outstanding contributions to
sustainable development made by a not-for-profit group.  The prize will be
awarded to a single organization each year.

The closing date for entries is 3/31/04.  The winner of the first annual
prize is expected to be named in January, 2005.  For more information, see:
http://www.alcanprizeforsustainability.com/en/conditions.asp

----------------------
Excerpted from a 2/6/04 column by Tom Horton in the Baltimore Sun:

GOING FROM LESS BAD TO A FUTURE OF GREEN
Kermit the Frog was right. It's not easy being green, and here's why:
Environmentalism is the curmudgeonly brake, grinding to restrain that heady,
high-revving, wondrous engine, the economy. 

Befitting brakemen, the language of us greenies is laced with words like
limits, avoid, minimize, reduce, sacrifice, regulate. Right now, it has to
be that way. For all our talk of "win-win" solutions, the faster our modern
industrial economy runs, the worse nature usually fares. It's a hell of a
thing that a home-building recession is among our more reliable protectors
of open space; that a drought, cutting runoff from farms and streets, is the
only way we clear up Chesapeake Bay waters. 

Of course we're making environmental progress. Progress toward being less
bad. But you know how that story ends? The same as if we're bad, or more
bad. It just takes longer. Is it our fate to lurch down the highway to the
future, one foot tromping the gas, one simultaneously mashing the brake,
trying to arrive with the least wreckage possible? 

Maybe not. Consider Toyota's gas-electric hybrid car, the Prius. The harder
you brake, the more the friction charges the electric motor, which powers
the vehicle in its cleanest, most fuel-efficient mode. Now, take a leap
beyond the Prius, and imagine an economy that, the faster it ran, the
greener we'd be. Buildings would emulate trees, producing more oxygen and
more energy than they used, cleansing the wastes of their inhabitants, and
providing beautiful workspace "habitat." 

New products, from autos to carpeting, would be designed so their
manufacture produces air emissions and waterborne effluent too clean to
regulate. The products themselves would be infinitely recyclable in
industrial closed loops or compostable, returning their components to enrich
the soil. Imagine finishing a cola and tossing the bottle, knowing it will
degrade, not just harmlessly, but with benefit to the soil - seeds implanted
in the bottle at the factory will sprout into trees. Imagine shoes with
soles, as they abrade with wear, that release beneficial nutrients rather
than today's mix of toxic compounds. 

Many have envisioned such a future, though few so compellingly as William
McDonough, a landscape architect and author of "Cradle to Cradle - Remaking
the Way We Make Things" (North Point Press, 2002). What really sets
McDonough apart is how his design firm, and his collaborations with
co-author and German chemist Michael Braungart, are putting the above
"imaginings" into practice with corporate clients that range from Ford and
IBM to Nike and Oberlin College. 

McDonough's book makes it clear that our current "cradle to grave,"
throwaway economy, and a regulatory structure that only hopes to make it
less bad, won't lead to a future we should want. "Regulation," McDonough
says, "can be seen as a failure of design." 

						- end -


  The Waste Prevention Forum archive is hosted by Reuses.com.